LATEST
Corruption Files
White House AI policy document
Big Tech & Surveillance

Trump Administration Releases 2026 National AI Policy Blueprint

By

The White House released a 142-page National AI Policy Blueprint on Friday, outlining the administration's strategy for maintaining U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence while mitigating risks from the technology.

The blueprint includes five pillars: AI research and development investment ($32 billion over five years), workforce training and education, regulation of high-risk AI applications, export controls on advanced AI chips, and international coalition-building to counter Chinese influence.

Unlike the European Union's comprehensive AI Act, the U.S. blueprint relies heavily on existing sectoral regulators (FDA, FCC, FTC) rather than creating a new federal AI agency. 'We believe in innovation-first regulation,' said White House AI advisor Michael Kratsios.

Controversial provisions

Civil liberties groups have criticized the blueprint's surveillance-related provisions, which would expand the use of AI-powered facial recognition at airports and border crossings without additional congressional oversight. 'This is a surveillance wishlist dressed up as a competitiveness plan,' said Kade Crockford of the ACLU.

The blueprint also calls for mandatory vulnerability disclosure for frontier AI models, a provision strongly opposed by major tech companies including OpenAI and Google.

We believe in innovation-first regulation. Our goal is to lead the world in AI, not hamstring American companies with red tape.

— Michael Kratsios, White House AI Advisor

Congressional action is required for many of the blueprint's funding proposals. Bipartisan AI legislation has stalled in both chambers over disagreements on liability protections for AI developers.

Mirror Standard — Investigative Journalism
Simone Varlette — author photo
About Author

Simone worked in network security for six years before she realized the bigger threat wasn't coming from outside corporate firewalls. She now writes about the companies that have built entire business models on the quiet collection of personal data — who they sell it to, which regulators look the other way, and how the legal language in terms-of-service agreements is specifically designed to be unreadable. She is not particularly interested in being reassured that everything is fine.

SubstackMedium

Related posts